Material adverse change (“MAC”) clauses (or material adverse effect clauses, as they are also known) are provisions often found in loan and other financing documents which allow lenders to refuse to fund or continue funding a transaction if such a change occurs.
The purpose of the MAC clause is to provide the lender with protection such that if a major adverse change occurs from the date a loan or other financing agreement is signed – and such a change may relate to any number of factors (see below) – then an event of default is triggered and the lender can essentially pull out of the transaction and often demand immediate repayment of any funds already lent to the borrower, together with interest and any other costs payable.
What do MAC clauses cover?
The definition of MAC clauses and their use in documents vary widely, depending on the type of transaction, the market standards at the time of negotiation, the bargaining powers of the parties and a number of external factors including political stability and the economy itself. It is common to see a more aggressive use of MAC clauses from lenders when there is a downturn in the economy and therefore borrowers are forced to accept terms that they would otherwise refuse.
In facility agreements, for example, it is common to see a MAC clause in relation to the following types of changes, among others:
This means that if a material adverse change occurs in relation to any of the above – this determination is often made at the lender’s sole discretion – then an event of default is triggered and the lender can stop the financing and demand repayment of all borrowings and costs to date.
How are MAC clauses defined?
The definition of the MAC clause is one of the most important and heavily negotiated definitions in any finance documentation.
Lenders typically seek to keep the definition as wide as possible and may require that an event of default is triggered if an event has a material adverse effect on the borrower’s ability to perform any of its obligations under the finance documents. Conversely, borrowers seek to keep the definition as narrow as possible and will seek to agree that an event of default is only triggered if a material adverse change affects its ability to comply with its financial covenants or payment obligations under the finance documents.
While many of the negotiations surrounding finance documents often seem more theoretical, or point-scoring, than practically applicable, the MAC clause is, in fact, a clause which can and is invoked. Most recently, we have seen two cases in Oman where Omani banks have invoked the clause, causing the relevant borrowers to have to refinance their loans as a result.
Where a lender has successfully negotiated that it will determine the occurrence of a material adverse change “in its sole discretion”, it is usual for borrowers to negotiate that the lender “act reasonably”. Borrowers also seek to negotiate materiality qualifications, i.e., that if a material adverse change has occurred that it will have a material effect on a material obligation. This is to avoid an event of default being triggered over a trivial breach or the breach of a trivial term.
Monday, June 4, 2012
Material Adverse Change Clauses
Labels:
MAC clause,
material adverse changes,
Omani banks,
Omani law
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)